Theresia Defranceschi, 1843
A duplicate entry, kept at its published address. The person is recorded under Teresia Defranceschi.
This page and Teresia Defranceschi are the same person.
Both rows were built from one record — FamilySearch — by two
passes of this archive that spelled the name differently, one from the register
and one from the family tree. The register's spelling is
kept as the person's page, and everything this row held was folded into it before
this notice was written. The page stays here because its address was published, and
an archive that moves its own addresses is not much of an archive.
The family
2 names in the record are not drawn above: fatherLeonardus Defranceschi— the dates do not fit a record of 1879 · motherMaria Flegar (Defranceschi)— the dates do not fit a record of 1879
This chart is the direct line and nothing else. Brothers and sisters are not drawn here: this archive records kin against a NAME rather than against a person, so the family on a name page may belong to several different people of that name. Where it is drawn it is read from the direct line, person by person.
What the archive knows
sameAs the other one. This archive held two rows for one child, one spelt with an h. Neither is retired — a person id is minted once and frozen and a moved id is a dead URL — and the archive already had the answer: twenty-nine other rows carry a sameAs saying «this row and that row are one person». It needed no decision from David, only the precedent being noticed. The register names her TERESIA, without the h.
⭐ Her godfather's surname was TESTED before it was published, and it survives. This archive withdrew a «Salman» reading four days earlier because the family proved to be Palman. So the word here was set beside the same scribe's own «Franciscus Palman sutor» of 28 April 1841, at one magnification — the plate is published — and they are not the same word: a different initial, seven letters against six, and a medial a between the l and the m that Palman has nowhere. The 1843 word is Salamon.
⚠ That is a lead on the Salomon maternal line, not a connection to it. Tying Antonio Salamon to Gračišće is what would make it one, and nothing yet does. Worklist 174 carries the work.No one else in this archive carries this name. See the name index →