Clementina Defranceschi

…1840, that «a gap this wide means one side is describing a different person's death», and that «this needs the burial register, not a judgement». The burial register was walked today and answers it: «1870 Martii 10ma· 7· Clementina Defranceschi, possidens, munita SS Sacram. et sepulta 11. Martii· 47· Phthisis» (M01069286, p. 114) Forty-seven on 10 March 1870 closes exactly on the declared birth of 3 October 1822. At 10 March 1840 she would have been seventeen. The…

…on 10 March 1870 closes exactly on the declared birth of 3 October 1822. At 10 March 1840 she would have been seventeen. The tree was right and this archive was wrong. And a second pointer had been sitting on the same row since 5 October: a Clementina Defranceschi stands godmother in 1841 — which a woman dead in 1840 cannot do. Fixed: death 1840 → 1870 on the roster row and on @I40@, re-declared in data/decisions.json in the same commit. The pid keeps 1822 because it…

…days old in 1821, and the death register proves it to the hour Her page· her sister's· the pedigree This roster gave Clementina Defranceschi, born 28 January 1821, a death of 1870, carried over from the family tree — while recording as an inference that she had probably died in infancy, because her parents gave the name again twenty months later.…

…tree 1870 — stands, and has merely lost the comfortable explanation that the two dates belonged to two women. One of them is still wrong about a real person, and the death register has not yet reached her. ✔ One thing it does settle. The Clementina Defranceschi who stood godmother at Gologorica on 20 February 1840, entered civis, was published as possibly either sister. She can only be the younger. 6 Oct 2026 minor A son of Josephus and Lambertina…

…families did when a child died — and it explains why the 1826 census date sat between the two. ⭐ 6 Oct 2026 — DEATH YEAR CORRECTED 1840 → 1870 from the burial register, which this archive had itself named as the thing needed: «1870 Martii 10ma· 7· Clementina Defranceschi, possidens, munita SS Sacram. et sepulta 11. Martii· 47· Phthisis» (M01069286, p. 114). Forty-seven on 10 March 1870 closes exactly on the birth of 3 October 1822. The family tree's 1870 was right; this archive's 1840 was wrong. See /corrections/.…

…the 1826 status animarum as «filius Usualdi et Apoloniæ» (M01069328). Maiden surname not given; the register names her once and only in the genitive. New to this archive on 30 September 2026., @F20@ @I15@ Clementina Defranceschi F 28 JAN 1821 birthYear 30 JAN 1821 deathYear Gologorica Daughter of Josephus & Lambertina (house 104). Died at two days old, 30 January 1821 — the elder of the two…

…and that is the shape of the problem this archive has with the Defranceschi women of Gologorica. «Februarii 20· domus 2· FRANCISCUS natus hodie· Joannes Sestan, agricola· SANCTA ALEXANDRA nata DEFRANCESCHI· Franciscus Marciolin, Clementina Defranceschi· ille clavium faber, haec civis» (doc — Gologorica baptisms 1784–1880 — DAPA microfilm ZM34K-214, M01069115, folio 102.) ⭐ SANCTA ALEXANDRA DEFRANCESCHI gets her first document. This archive held her from David's MyHeritage tree and…

…the tree and the archive disagree about a Clementina's death by thirty years: 1840 here, 1870 there. The archive's working inference has been that the elder died young and the name was reused, which is what families did. A Clementina Defranceschi standing godmother in February 1840, old enough to be chosen and entered as a citizen, is evidence in that argument and it does not settle it. She may be either of them. The burial register — 91 frames on the same reel, 2% read — is what…

…tree 1870 — loses one of its two explanations: it can no longer be settled by saying the 1870 belongs to her sister. Both rows are corrected and the remaining dispute is stated, not resolved. ⭐ And it identifies the godmother of 1840. A Clementina Defranceschi stood godmother at Gologorica on 20 February 1840, entered civis, and this archive wrote that she might be either of the two. She cannot be the elder. There is only one Clementina left. «1817. Die 19 Xbris hora 10ma…

…had already written «Epidemia» as a bare cause twice in 1868 (/gologorica-line/) when the priest had no better word. ⭐ AND IN THE MIDDLE OF THEM, AT HOUSE 7, A DIFFERENT ILLNESS AND A THIRTY-YEAR CORRECTION. «1870 Martii 10ma· 7· Clementina Defranceschi, POSSIDENS, munita SS Sacram. et sepulta 11. Martii· 47· Phthisis» This archive published that she died on 10 March 1840. She died on 10 March 1870. The day and month were right; the decade was not.…

…year by 30 years, and that is the serious kind. … This needs the burial register, not a judgement.» The burial register was the thing walked today, and it answered in one line. A second pointer had been sitting beside it since 5 October: a Clementina Defranceschi stands godmother in 1841, which a woman dead in 1840 cannot do. The tree was right and this archive was wrong; the year is moved and the pid re-declared. And the status word has shifted. Where this book…