Joannes Baptista Defranceschi of Gologorica (d. by 1709)
Joannes Baptista Defranceschi of Gologorica (d. by 1709). Gologorica. Every mention of this name in the archive — 2 across 2 pages.
He is named only as a dead man, twice, eleven years apart — and that is enough to put a Defranceschi household at Gologorica before 1709. > 30 August 1709 · «Vittoria figlia q. Gio: Battà Defranceschi» > 20 May 1720 · «Lucia moglie di q. Gio: Batta Defranceschi» (doc — DAPA ZM34K-214, M01069215 and M01069210: the Gologorica obit calendar, under 30 August and 20 May.) Two independent entries, a daughter and a wife, each calling him «q.» — so he was dead before August 1709. (doc that such a man existed and was dead; inf that the two entries name the same man, on the forename pair, the surname and the parish.)* ⚠ He is NOT the Gio: Batta who died in the 1740s aged seventy, who was alive throughout. This archive now has two Giovanni Battista Defranceschi at Gologorica a generation apart, and the standing warning about this village's repeating forenames gains a second instance. ⚠ No birth, no death date, no house, no occupation, no parents. The register the calendar indexes has never been read and would give his wife's and daughter's entries in full.
Appears on: The Gologorica Line · Lives on one scale
The Gologorica Line
…which is the man whose death entry of 1813 calls him «defuncti Josephi filius», widower of Catharina née Jablich, born 1752 and so twenty-one that September. So one book, in nine months, writes both Joannes Baptista Defranceschi of Gologorica, each with his father's name attached. This archive has been telling them apart by their wives and by their house numbers. It can now tell them apart the way the parish did.· the groom of 1774· the witness of…
…Recorded as a thread, claimed as nothing. twojb1786 : ⭐⭐⭐ The priest tells the two Joannes Baptistas apart himself, in one sentence, by their wives, This archive has spent weeks separating the two Joannes Baptista Defranceschi of Gologorica — by house number, by index byname, by patronymic, by wife. On 3 October 1786 the parish priest did it in a single sentence, because he needed to. Die 3 Octobris 1786· «Ego Parochus hujus loci…
A dossier is every mention of a name anywhere in this archive's data, gathered automatically and linked back to the page it appears on, with what the archive knows about the person set out at the top. Identity here is by NAME, not by resolved individual: where two people share a name they share a dossier, and the archive says so rather than guessing. Rebuilt from the roster, so every person the archive can name has a page — including the ones read straight off a register that no index anywhere contains.