Pietro Ermanni
Pietro Ermanni. Mione. Every mention of this name in the archive — 3 across 4 pages.
The person of this name
This page is a name index. The person has their own page.
- Pietro Ermanni — dates unknown, Mione
Of the Erman family named alongside Zuane De Franceschi in the 1679 list of Mione men working in imperial Istria. His recorded age moves between 54 and 59 across five acts against an actual 56–60 — the reason this archive stopped arguing from ages
Appears on: The Defranceschi Archive · Back to Carnia · Lives on one scale · About
Back to Carnia
…agricoltore, portando seco un infante di sesso mascolino» Born the day before — 20 August 1808, at three in the afternoon, at Mione, and named Gio: Batta Benedetto «ha pure dichiarato esser il neonato figlio di Pietro Ermanni, e di Orsola nata Crosilla jugali», farmers of Mione — a household this archive did not have Lupieri Gio: Batta, thirty-two, «medico di professione» — a physician — and Lupieri Valentino, thirty, both of Luint «Gio:…
…earlier so valuable, because that one did: «suo fratello Osvaldo». What can be said: a man of fifty-six does not carry a stranger's newborn to the town hall. And Gio: Pietro Erman de Franceschi is the son of a dead Pietro Erman — so a living Pietro Ermanni at Mione in 1808, married and with a first child, is most naturally his own son, named for his grandfather. The alternative is a brother. Inferred, and labelled so. What is documented is the household itself: Pietro Ermanni × Orsola née…
…— so a living Pietro Ermanni at Mione in 1808, married and with a first child, is most naturally his own son, named for his grandfather. The alternative is a brother. Inferred, and labelled so. What is documented is the household itself: Pietro Ermanni × Orsola née Crosilla, agricoltori of Mione, and their son Gio: Batta Benedetto, born 20 August 1808 at three in the afternoon. One more detail worth keeping: the father is entered as plain «Ermanni» while the older man signs «Erman De…
A dossier is every mention of a name anywhere in this archive's data, gathered automatically and linked back to the page it appears on, with what the archive knows about the person set out at the top. Identity here is by NAME, not by resolved individual: where two people share a name they share a dossier, and the archive says so rather than guessing. Rebuilt from the roster, so every person the archive can name has a page — including the ones read straight off a register that no index anywhere contains.