Victoria Trecento (m. 1771)
Victoria Trecento (m. 1771), born about 1750 — estimated, not recorded. Svetvinčenat. Every mention of this name in the archive — 5 across 4 pages.
She married a Dominicus de Franceschi, and her wedding was found on 28 September 2026. 10 June 1771, Svetvinčenat: «Dominicus de Franceschi, dispensatis denuntiationibus, Matrimo. junctus est cum Victoria Trecento per verba de p.nti mutuo utriusque præhabito consensu, per me D. Martino Luciani Cap.o ex commissione Parochi, Testibus Marco […] ac Victorio de Franceschi, alijsq.» — film 005497886, frame 61, read at 2× and the groom's line again at 2.2×. (doc.) The banns were dispensed, and the parish priest was absent — the chaplain Martino Luciani married them on his commission. Her surname is unusual here. «Trecento» appears nowhere else in this archive, and nowhere else in the seventy-odd Svetvinčenat marriages read so far, whose surnames run Percovich, Bulcich, Zadro, Venier, Mazzan, Justinaz, Angelich, Milcich, Stancovich. She may be an incomer, and the register does not say from where. Born about 1750 — estimated from the marriage, and nothing else is known of her. 28 September 2026 — she died young, and her husband's second wedding is how we know. On 13 January 1779 Domenico is «Ved.o p.mi voti», a widower of first vows, marrying Fosca Placich. So Victoria died between 10 June 1771 and 13 January 1779 — married at about twenty-one, dead within seven and a half years. No year is printed: the bracket is wide and the death register does not survive on film. (doc for the widowhood; the bracket is all it gives.)
Appears on: The Lines · Lives on one scale · About · Worklist
The Lines
…— «Marc'Antonius Jacomini … Parenzensis, et Fusca filia q. Mathiæ de Franceschi», a third daughter of the same house, witnessed by Mathias Santalezza — her sister's husband.· 10 Jun 1771 — «Dominicus de Franceschi … cum Victoria Trecento … Testibus … ac Victorio de Franceschi». A Defranceschi marrying with a Defranceschi standing witness.· 13 Aug 1766 — «Gaspare de Franceschi q.m Ant.o ex hoc Castro», a patronymic that excluded two of three candidates…
…Parrochia ha contrato matrimonio per verba de presenti con Fosca f.a Giuseppe Placich della Parrochia di Simino» — frame 82. (doc.) Three facts are packed into that line.· «Ved.o p.mi voti» — widower of first vows. So Victoria Trecento, whom he married on 10 June 1771, was dead — married at about twenty-one and gone inside seven and a half years. No year can be printed: the bracket is 1771×1779 and the deaths of Svetvinčenat before 1859 are…
Worklist
…something — but it is verification, not discovery, and this item had been calling it discovery.· frames· dates· marriages· the name· 57–60· Nov 1767 – Dec 1770· ~34· —· 61· Jun 1771· 8· NEW — Dominicus × Victoria Trecento, witness Victorio· 62· Jul–Nov 1771· 11· Jacobo q. Jacobi, ×2 — 23 Nov known, 25 Nov new· 63· Jan–Jul 1772· 9· Giacobus filius Giacobi × Nicolina — already published· 64· Oct 1772 – Feb 1773· 12· Antonio ×4, Victorio…
…× Nicolina — already published· 64· Oct 1772 – Feb 1773· 12· Antonio ×4, Victorio filio Antonij — already published· The one genuinely new act is the best of them. 10 June 1771 — «Dominicus de Franceschi … junctus est cum Victoria Trecento … Testibus Marco … ac Victorio de Franceschi». A Defranceschi marrying with a Defranceschi standing witness, which this archive has not had before. Read as Dominico the twin of 1748…
…appearances of the name. 28 Sept 2026 — marriage seam read to frame 85. Frames 79–85: four findings, three nils named. Antonia di q.m Giacomo marries a Carnian (7 Jan 1779); Domenico remarries as «Ved.o p.mi voti» six days later, which kills Victoria Trecento 1771×1779; Fosca Placich is a second Fosca the archive nearly conflated; Antonio still witnessing 22 Nov 1779. All four are in the Svetvinčenat line, not only here. Next: frame 86 onward — the seam runs to about frame 108 for 1790 and 149…
A dossier is every mention of a name anywhere in this archive's data, gathered automatically and linked back to the page it appears on, with what the archive knows about the person set out at the top. Identity here is by NAME, not by resolved individual: where two people share a name they share a dossier, and the archive says so rather than guessing. Rebuilt from the roster, so every person the archive can name has a page — including the ones read straight off a register that no index anywhere contains.