Vincentius Sestan

…parent bears the name /households/ — «the large households» and «the daughters' households» That the Franciscus Bubić and Joannes Bubić households of Gologorica were among the large households of the name, and that the Vincentius Sestan household (h120) was among «households where a Defranceschi woman is the mother». None of the three has a Defranceschi parent. The Bubić households were recorded by the Gologorica sweep of 11 October for the Grah wives of the 1862…

…was Deprato in 1801, 1809 and 1817 — by writing that the death book's index puts two household blocks at that number and so there was «no family connection at all». It is withdrawn. The 1826 Status Animarum refutes it in two lines. «Vincentius Sestan, cives»· «Maria Uxor nata DEPRATO» (M01069324) «Antonius Sestan defᵗⁱ Vincentii et Mariae»· «Joanna uxor nata DEFRANCESCHI» (M01069323) Vincentius Sestan's wife was born a Deprato; their son's wife was born a Defranceschi.…

…withdrawn. The 1826 Status Animarum refutes it in two lines. «Vincentius Sestan, cives»· «Maria Uxor nata DEPRATO» (M01069324) «Antonius Sestan defᵗⁱ Vincentii et Mariae»· «Joanna uxor nata DEFRANCESCHI» (M01069323) Vincentius Sestan's wife was born a Deprato; their son's wife was born a Defranceschi. Two marriages, two generations, and they are the exact three surnames the index stacks at house 6. The house did not hold strangers in succession — it moved with a marriage.…

…register — 91 frames on the same reel, 2% read — is what settles it, and it has not been opened. ⭐ FRANCISCA DEFRANCESCHI, fourteen months later. Folio 102 again, lower down: «Aprilis 14 1841· domus 2· Franciscus natus hodie· Vincentius Sestan· Maria n. Udovicich· Josephus Selesco ac FRANCISCA DEFRANCESCHI», the surname written in on the line below as if the scribe had run out of room for it. This is the Francisca the archive already knows — married to Antonius of house 6 on 29…

…was that the death book's index gives house 6 to two unrelated households, so there was «no family connection at all». That is wrong, and the 1826 Status Animarum says so in two lines on two facing pages. (page 7, house 2) «Vincentius Sestan, cives, 25 Martii 1780» «Maria Uxor nata DEPRATO, 9 Januarii 1786» (page 8, house 3) «Antonius Sestan defᵗⁱ Vincentii et Mariae, 29 Junii 1814» «Joanna uxor nata DEFRANCESCHI, 25 Junii 1818» ⭐ Vincentius Sestan's wife was…

…2) «Vincentius Sestan, cives, 25 Martii 1780» «Maria Uxor nata DEPRATO, 9 Januarii 1786» (page 8, house 3) «Antonius Sestan defᵗⁱ Vincentii et Mariae, 29 Junii 1814» «Joanna uxor nata DEFRANCESCHI, 25 Junii 1818» ⭐ Vincentius Sestan's wife was born a Deprato. Their son Antonius Sestan's wife was born a Defranceschi. Two marriages, two generations, three surnames — and they are the exact three surnames the index stacks at house 6. SO THE TRUE SHAPE IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WAS…

…Defranceschi»· civilitas· 3· «Maria Defranceschi» (house 7)· civilitas· 4· «Albertus Peschle, Doctor»· «Victoria uxor n. Calligarich»· civis· 5· «Jacobus Defranceschi»· civilitas· 6· «Vincentius Sestan»· «Maria uxor nata Deprato»· cives· 7· «Petrus Defranceschi» (house 7)· civilitas· 8· «Petrus Defranceschi»· «Anna mater nata Bembo»· civilitas· 9· «Josephus Peer»· rusticus· 10· «Leonardus…

…row was closed on the reading that the death book's index gives house 6 two unrelated household blocks, so a Defranceschi dying there had «no family connection at all». The 1826 Status Animarum refutes it: «Maria Uxor nata DEPRATO» (wife of Vincentius Sestan) and «Joanna uxor nata DEFRANCESCHI» (wife of their son Antonius). The three surnames the index stacks at house 6 are joined by two marriages in two generations. ⭐ THE QUESTION NOW IS A BETTER ONE. «Joanna, uxor nata Defranceschi, 25…