Fusca Defranceschi (Lazarić), 1821 – 1888

The family

The generation above

Matteo Defranceschi6 people of this name — not linked

Francescaa register read here

Fusca Defranceschi (Lazarić)1821 – 1888

4 siblings

Helena de Franceschib. 5 Aug 1742 Maria de Franceschib. 15 Oct 1745

Victoria de Franceschib. 19 Sep 1749

Irena de Franceschib. 11 Feb 1752

the direct line, argued on the line

This chart is the direct line and nothing else. Brothers and sisters are not drawn here: this archive records kin against a NAME rather than against a person, so the family on a name page may belong to several different people of that name. Where it is drawn it is read from the direct line, person by person.

One relationship on this chart was never date-tested. This archive refuses a relative whose years do not fit — more than six out for a child, outside twelve to sixty for a parent. Where one side has no year at all that test cannot run, and the link is drawn on the name. It is shown because most people in the early registers carry no year, and refusing them would empty the chart of the centuries this archive exists to show. It is counted here because a line nothing tested is a weaker claim than a line that passed, and the chart cannot tell them apart.

What the archive knows

⭐⭐ A WIFE OF THE NAME THIS ARCHIVE DID NOT HOLD — read on the page, 12 October 2026. Ližnjan «Liber Defunctorum», page 101, entry 23 of 1888, house 75: > «Mort. 17 Augusti, Sep. 19 ejusdem, 1888» — «Fusca uxor Antonii Defranceschi nata Lazarić» — «an. 67» · «naturalis ordin.» · «nat. 30/4 1821» · D. Greg. Smak, par. Fusca, wife of Antonius Defranceschi, born Lazarić: born 30 April 1821, died 17 August 1888 aged 67, buried on the 19th, of natural causes. The three figures check each other — born 1821, died 1888, age 67. ⚠ She was in this archive's own files the whole time, and nobody took her up. register.json holds her as lead XQM3-P992, which the index garbled into «Antonii Defranceschi Or Lazarić» — a flattened parent list that the page resolves at once into uxor … nata. She is one of three Ližnjan people found this week sitting as unused leads, and the gate now checks for that. ⚠ Her birth year was deliberately left empty when this row was minted, because that session stopped before reaching the Ætas column and an index is not a document. It was filled only after going back to the page and reading it. ⭐⭐ HER MARRIAGE, AND HER BIRTHPLACE, found 12 October in the marriage book. Ližnjan «Liber Copulatorum», page 22, entry 168: > «1 Junii 1861» · house 59 · SPONSUS «Antonius Defranceski q. Matthæi, agr.», catholic, Ætas 41, Viduus · SPONSA «Fosca nata Lazarić q. Simeonis, V[idu]a q. Antonii Mohorić agr., nata e Medolino» — «nata e Medolino»: born at Medulin, the next parish. And both were widowed: he «Viduus», she «vidua q. Antonii Mohorić». Before 1861 she was a Mohorić, which is why she appears in no earlier Defranceschi entry. Her father was Simeon Lazarić, dead by 1861. Waypoint 9R2Z-4WG, frame 54. (doc — the burial register of the parish, read at the page.)