The Defranceschi Archive
the same person as another page

Guiseppe / Josephus / Josip Defranceschi, 1723 – 1787

A duplicate entry, kept at its published address. The person is recorded under Josephus Defranceschi.

This page and Josephus Defranceschi are the same person.

Both rows were built from one record — FamilySearch — by two passes of this archive that spelled the name differently, one from the register and one from the family tree. The register's spelling is kept as the person's page, and everything this row held was folded into it before this notice was written. The page stays here because its address was published, and an archive that moves its own addresses is not much of an archive.

Go to Josephus Defranceschi.

Name
Guiseppe / Josephus / Josip Defranceschi
Years
1723 – 1787
Place
Gologorica, Istra
Line
carnia
Found in
Family tree

The family

No family chart is drawn for this person, and that is a statement about the data rather than about them. This archive records kin against a name — the tree on a name page gathers everyone who shares it, so it may hold one person's dates beside another's wife. Rather than hand a reader a family that might not be this person's, the chart is drawn only where the relationship is recorded person by person, which today means the direct line.

What the archive knows

✔✔ ADJUDICATED 11 October 2026 — this row and josephus-defranceschi-1722 are ONE MAN, and that row is the one with his documents. > 36 · «Die 30, hora 4.ᵗᵃ Matutina, anno quo supra [1787] · Obijt Josephus de Franceschj, MERCATOR, ætatis suæ annorum 64» (DAPA ZM34K-214, M01068984.) Aged sixty-four at the end of 1787 is a birth about 1723 and a death in 1787 — this row's figures, to the year. But the man in that entry is the merchant of house 36, husband of Helena and father of five, and every document this archive holds for him sits on the other row. And the year that other row carried — a death in 1782 — does not exist. The whole of 1782 in the male death sequence was read entry by entry: nine men and boys, every one named, not a Defranceschi among them; and the obit calendar never produced him either. > One row had his documents and the wrong years. This one had his years and no documents. Marked sameAs, not merged. It retires nothing, moves no id and keeps both published addresses alive — the mechanism this archive has used thirty times and should not have put to a worklist again.

1 other person in this archive carry this name. They are different individuals and are not this person. See the name index →