Madalena Percovich (wife of Mattio Defranceschi, Ližnjan), 1788 – 1849
A duplicate entry, kept at its published address. The person is recorded under Maddalena Defranceschi.
This page and Maddalena Defranceschi are the same person.
Both rows were built from one record — FamilySearch — by two
passes of this archive that spelled the name differently, one from the register
and one from the family tree. The register's spelling is
kept as the person's page, and everything this row held was folded into it before
this notice was written. The page stays here because its address was published, and
an archive that moves its own addresses is not much of an archive.
The register pages The register pages this person is read from — each plate is a whole page of the book, so the neighbouring lines stand with the entry. Every plate links to the same image on FamilySearch (free account).
The family
This chart is the direct line and nothing else. Brothers and sisters are not drawn here: this archive records kin against a NAME rather than against a person, so the family on a name page may belong to several different people of that name. Where it is drawn it is read from the direct line, person by person.
What the archive knows
doc — baptisms of 1819 and 1821 (image 6 of waypoint 9R2Z-44D, open); the Percovich are godparents to both (Luca Percovich fu Luca and Maria his wife). Her own birth and death are not found with certainty. Not of the name's surname; kept because she married into it. Born about 1788 — 27 at her marriage to «Mario de Franceschi deto Marulin di Antonio» (21) on 12 November 1815 (Ližnjan marriages, page 1, entry 2; read by the 12 October session, doc). Named «Maddalena Perkovich» as the mother in the marriages of her daughters Maria (23 February 1848) and Madalena (23 July 1849) (page 15, image 11 of waypoint 9R2Z-44C); the parents column does not mark a mother's death. Probably buried 6 January 1849, aged 61 — «Maddalena fu Matteo Defranceschi», house 17 (deaths page 27, image 18 of waypoint 9R2Z-4WG): inf, and the age is the proof — 61 in 1849 is 1788 exactly, as 27 in 1815 is — with the house and the «fu Matteo» (the relict of the Matteo who died on 20 December 1839). The alternative, a daughter of some other Matteo born in the same year at the same house, needs a coincidence. I first withdrew this reading on the births book's use of «fu X» for a woman's father and restore it on the age. Joined to the index row of that burial.No one else in this archive carries this name.