Catharinam Sablich (Defranceschi)

…The Bakar household page carries this sentence, written when the household was reconstructed from the FamilySearch indexes: «A separate entry has a «Joannem Defranceschi» marrying «Catharinam Sablich» — either the same man remarried, or a brother.» ⚠ The register was opened today and he is neither. «Die 10 9bris pro domo D. Sebastiani Sablich, Nuptiis in facie Ecclesiæ contractis inter D.ⁿᵘᵐ Joannem Bap. tistam De…

…or a brother.» ⚠ The register was opened today and he is neither. «Die 10 9bris pro domo D. Sebastiani Sablich, Nuptiis in facie Ecclesiæ contractis inter D.ⁿᵘᵐ Joannem Bap. tistam De franceschi ex GOLLOGORIZZA et D. Catharinam Sablich, tradidit D. Parochus Buccarensis Jacobus Polian, præsentibus Senatore D. Josepho Walis et D. Josepho Smich» (doc — FamilySearch, «Croatia, Delnice Deanery Catholic Church Books, 1571–1926»: Bakar, Religious Marriage Registers…

…has been looking for since 30 September (/person/catharina-defranceschi-jablich-gologorica/). ⚠ How the error was made, which is the useful part. The entry was read from the index, and the index records only «Joannem Defranceschi» and «Catharinam Sablich» — no place. With no place in front of it, a Defranceschi marrying at Bakar in a set of Bakar Defranceschi records can only look like a Bakar Defranceschi. An index strips the field that would have told you the record is not about the family you…

…the father in his son's marriage entry — and indexed as a person in his own right. His son «Joanem Bap. Defranceschi» marries «Catharinam Akacich», with an Antonius Akacich named beside her. ⚠ A separate entry has a «Joannem Defranceschi» marrying «Catharinam Sablich» — this page read that from the index as «either the same man remarried, or a brother». He is neither. The register was opened on 9 October 2026 and the groom is «ex GOLLOGORIZZA» — the Joannes Baptista of…

…And the Bakar register holds a marriage that belongs to the Istrian line 10 November 1783 — «pro domo D. Sebastiani Sablich, Nuptiis in facie Ecclesiæ contractis inter D.ⁿᵘᵐ Joannem Bap. De franceschi ex GOLLOGORIZZA et D. Catharinam Sablich, tradidit D. Parochus Buccarensis Jacobus Polian, præsentibus Senatore D. Josepho Walis et D. Josepho Smich» (doc — FamilySearch, Bakar Religious Marriage Registers 1739–1808, film 005494714, image 172 of 226, page…

…son «Joanem Bap. Defranceschi» marries «Catharinam Akacich», with an Antonius Akacich named beside her. A separate entry has a «Joannem Defranceschi» marrying «Catharinam SABLICH» — either the same man remarried, or a brother.» «Catharinam Sablich». «Catharina née Jablich ex Buccari». One letter, and the archive has been reading them as two unrelated problems in two different stories — the Bakar one as a question about which Bakar man married twice, the Gologorica one as a wife with no…

…bride's father. The film was opened and it gives all three. «Die 10 9bris pro domo D. Sebastiani Sablich, Nuptiis in facie Ecclesiæ contractis inter D.ⁿᵘᵐ Joannem Bap. tistam De franceschi ex GOLLOGORIZZA et D. Catharinam Sablich, tradidit D. Parochus Buccarensis Jacobus Polian, præsentibus Senatore D. Josepho Walis et D. Josepho Smich» (doc — FamilySearch, «Croatia, Delnice Deanery Catholic Church Books, 1571–1926»: Bakar, Religious Marriage…

…test: find the Bakar scribe writing an unambiguous S and an unambiguous J on the same leaf. ✔ THE IMAGE WAS DOWNLOADED AND THE TEST RUN. IT DID NOT NEED THE REST OF THE LEAF. Line 1 «in domo D. Sabastiani Sablich»· line 3 «et D. Catharinam Sablich»· line 4 «Parochus Buccarensis Jacobus Polian»· line 5 «et D. Josepho Smich» The scribe's J — in «Jacobus» and «Josepho», three lines below — rises high and drops a long descender below the baseline, hooking left. The initial of…

…because a moved id is a dead URL. --- ⚠ And two sentences on the Bakar page are now wrong The Bakar household reads this entry as a local puzzle: «A separate entry has a «Joannem Defranceschi» marrying «Catharinam Sablich» — either the same man remarried, or a brother.» He is neither. He is not a Bakar Defranceschi at all — the register calls him «ex Gollogorizza». Corrected. The Bakar household loses a supposed second marriage and…

…--- ✔✔ 9 October 2026 — the family's own parish spells it SABLICH, and the proof is internal. The Bakar marriage of 10 November 1783 names the bride's father «D. Sabastiani Sablich» and the bride «D. Catharinam Sablich». The same scribe writes «Jacobus» and «Josepho» three lines below, both with a long descender below the baseline; the Sablich initial has none — and «Sabastiani» and «Sablich» open with the identical letterform, which in Sebastian…

…De Franceschi Franceschi M y Antonÿ De Franceschi Lucia in 6Z2F-LSSQ Joannem Defranceschi Defranceschi M y Catharinam Sablich in 6YBR-W44F Joannem Francetich Francetich y Margtam Joannis Verbicich lead 6YBR-FZZ7 Joannem Paulus Francischi Francischi…