Matheus Franciscus De Franceschi
Matheus Franciscus De Franceschi, bapt. 17 September 1739 — read in the register, not estimated. Vitipolis, Modrus-Fiume, Magyarország. Every mention of this name in the archive — 2 across 6 pages.
The person of this name
This page is a name index. The person has their own page.
- Matheus Franciscus De Franceschi — about 1749, Vitipolis, Modrus-Fiume, Magyarország
0 of the 11 relationships drawn above are written in a register this archive has read with its own eyes. 11 come from a FamilySearch index entry — a transcription, not the page.
A register does give this person a date — bapt. 17 September 1739, in the Liber Baptizatorum, St Vitus, Fiume. The chart above was drawn from a household built out of index entries that carry no date for this child, so it was tested against an estimate of about 1749 instead. The chart is not redrawn here and the estimate is not hidden — the record is simply no longer missing from the page.
Joined on a name alone. One household above could not be date-checked, because this archive holds no year for the person or for the household. Treat that link as a lead.
The households → · Every record naming Matheus Franciscus De Franceschi → · The Spine → · How this is decided →
Appears on: The Omiš Line · Household Explorer · The Archive · Our line, drawn · Register · Lives on one scale
The Omiš Line
…d. 1742 1753 Antonio De Franceschi d. 1 Sep 1753 1757 Aloysia Defranceschi d. 14 Sep 1757 1757 Maria Defranceschi d. 1757 Matheus Franciscus De Franceschi Aloysium Joannes Petre Defranceschi Franciscam Joanne Theresiam Defranceschi Nicolaus Francus De Franceschi Josepham…
Register
…Lucę Lucich lead XQMQ-HG8K Matheum Michaelem Francetich Francetich M y Mathei Francetich Elená Francetich lead XQMQ-HGYH Matheus Franciscus De Franceschi Franceschi M y Valentini De Franceschi Helenả De Franceschi in QKMK-SQFW Mathia Francetich Francetich F y…
A dossier is every mention of a name anywhere in this archive's data, gathered automatically and linked back to the page it appears on, with what the archive knows about the person set out at the top. Identity here is by NAME, not by resolved individual: where two people share a name they share a dossier, and the archive says so rather than guessing. Rebuilt from the roster, so every person the archive can name has a page — including the ones read straight off a register that no index anywhere contains.