Victoria de Franceschi
Victoria de Franceschi, 1750. Svetvinčenat. Every mention of this name in the archive — 3 across 2 pages.
Child of Giacomo de Franceschi and Pascasia (household h107 on the households list). Dated 25 March 1750, at Svetvinčenat. Evidence class: read — from registers this archive has read.
Child of Pietro de Franceschi and Jacoba (household h111 on the households list). Dated 1 February 1746, at Svetvinčenat. Evidence class: read — from registers this archive has read.
Child of Matteo Defranceschi and Francesca (household h112 on the households list). Dated 19 September 1749, at Svetvinčenat. Evidence class: read — from registers this archive has read.
This name sits in more than one household. 3 sets of parents survive the date check. The first is drawn. Joining them on a name alone is the mistake this site keeps having to correct.
8 of the 8 relationships drawn above are written in a register this archive has read with its own eyes.
The households → · Every record naming Victoria de Franceschi → · The Spine → · How this is decided →
This archive holds 4 other pages under what Say Your Name reconciles as the same given name in another language — a Latin register, a Venetian clerk, a Croatian village, a Hungarian office. They are not merged and none of them is claimed to be this person: a shared name is not a shared identity, and the archive will not join one to the other by machine. It is here so that a reader looking for a man the records called Josephus can see where they wrote him Josip.
Victoria di Jacobo Defranceschi (1750) · Vittoria De Franceschi · Vittoria Defranceschi · Vittoria Defranceschi (of Telve, 1894)
Appears on: Our line, drawn · Lives on one scale
This person has not been written up in an essay yet — most often read straight off a register page that no index anywhere contains. What is known is at the top, and the pages linked above are where the finding sits.
A dossier is every mention of a name anywhere in this archive's data, gathered automatically and linked back to the page it appears on, with what the archive knows about the person set out at the top. Identity here is by NAME, not by resolved individual: where two people share a name they share a dossier, and the archive says so rather than guessing. Rebuilt from the roster, so every person the archive can name has a page — including the ones read straight off a register that no index anywhere contains.