Jacobus de Franceschi
Jacobus de Franceschi, 1762–1850. Gologorica. Every mention of this name in the archive — 8 across 7 pages.
The person of this name
This page is a name index. The person has their own page.
- Jacobus de Franceschi — 1762 – 1850, Gologorica
The tree and this archive disagree about the birth year by 1 year, and the death year agrees. Tree 1762, here 1761. That is what an age produces. A record giving «aged N» rather than a date yields a birth year that depends on whether the birthday had passed, so the two are one year of arithmetic apart, not one of evidence. This archive keeps its own figure, which came off the register; the tree's is recorded so the difference is visible rather than silently resolved. (20 Sept 2026.)
---
⭐ 6 October 2026 — his death entry, read: and it disagrees with this archive twice.
> Gologorica deaths, image M01069273, page 88: «Decembris 8° · 7 · Jacobus Defranceschi, CIVIS, munitus ss. moribundorum et sepultus die 10 hujus · 88 · febris et senectus»
House 7 — the house the 1826 census gives him — «civis» where the other men on the page are «agla», last rites received, buried two days later. (doc.)
⚠ TWO TENSIONS, both recorded rather than resolved.
1. The day. This archive carries 3 December 1850; the register says 8 December, and has him buried on the 10th, which fits an 8 December death better than a 3 December one. The 3 December is not sourced anywhere in this archive's own line data.
2. The age. Eighty-eight on 8 December 1850 puts his birth between December 1761 and December 1762. This archive carries a precise 21 July 1761, which would have made him eighty-nine. *The row already noted that 1761 against the tree's 1762 is «one year of arithmetic, not one of evidence» — and the register's own age falls on the tree's side.
⚠ Neither year is changed here. A precise birth date beats an age at death if it came off a baptism — and nobody has yet written down where the 21 July 1761 came from. That is the next thing to find.
---
⭐ 6 October 2026 — SETTLED, and this archive was the one that was wrong.
> Gologorica Status Animarum 1826, M01069323: «Jacobus Defranceschi · civilitas · 21 | Julii | 1762»
A date, not an age — so the arithmetic this row rightly identified was this archive's own. The figure is moved from 1761 to 1762; the tree agrees; the «88» on his death entry of 8 December 1850 agrees. The person id stays frozen at jacobus-de-franceschi-1761 because a moved id is a dead URL. Published on /corrections/.
---
⭐ 9 October 2026 — an earlier appearance by forty-two years, if it is him.
> 9 February 1784, Gologorica marriages: «...in Ecclesia Sanctæ Anastasiæ coram testibus Supano Martino Zabran, et Domino Jacobo de Franceschi, ambo ex hac Parochia»
(doc — DAPA ZM34K-214, M01069003, the marriage register opened for the first time today.)
Everything this row held of him began in 1826 — the census that gave him his birth date, and the death entry of 1850. A witnessing in 1784 is forty-two years earlier than anything else here.
⚠ The identification is inf, and the thing that strains it is the title. Born 21 July 1762, he would be twenty-one that February, and the entry styles him «Domino». The civilitas branch does carry the style — his own death entry enters him «CIVIS» where the men around him are «agla» — but an older Jacobus, otherwise unrecorded, would wear it more comfortably, and this archive holds only the one. No date is moved and no row is merged.
This archive holds 5 other pages under what Say Your Name reconciles as the same given name in another language — a Latin register, a Venetian clerk, a Croatian village, a Hungarian office. They are not merged and none of them is claimed to be this person: a shared name is not a shared identity, and the archive will not join one to the other by machine. It is here so that a reader looking for a man the records called Josephus can see where they wrote him Josip.
Giacomo De Franceschi · Giacomo Defranceschi · Giacomo de Franceschi (d. bef. 1771) · Giacomo de Franceschi (m. 1772) · Jacobus Defranceschi
Appears on: The Defranceschi Archive · The Gologorica Line · Method · The live tree, read against this archive · Lives on one scale · About · Worklist
The Defranceschi Archive
…nata Bembo», «Mariana ex fratre nepos» — and this archive had walked that book six days ago and asked the other one twice. Worklist 184 is reopened, not re-closed. The method note is here. 6 Oct 2026 Jacobus de Franceschi was born in 1762, not 1761 — and the census gives a date where this archive had arithmetic ordinary Jacobus de Franceschi· /gologorica-line/ This archive published 21 July 1761 and…
…184 is reopened, not re-closed. The method note is here. 6 Oct 2026 Jacobus de Franceschi was born in 1762, not 1761 — and the census gives a date where this archive had arithmetic ordinary Jacobus de Franceschi· /gologorica-line/ This archive published 21 July 1761 and recorded that the tree said 1762, keeping its own figure because the archive's came «off the register». The…
The Gologorica Line
…(doc — DAPA ZM34K-214, M01069130, folio 116.) ⚠ This archive may hold him twice — see the roster note and the worklist.,, @I33@ Jacobus de Franceschi M 21 JUL 1761 birthYear 3 DEC 1850 deathYear Bachelor (celebs), listed at the head of house 7 in the 1826 status animarum,,…
…one of ours standing in the church of Sancta Anastasia 9 February 1784 — «...in Ecclesia Sanctæ Anastasiæ coram testibus Supano Martino Zabran, et Domino Jacobo de Franceschi, ambo ex hac Parochia» The archive holds one Jacobus de Franceschi at Gologorica — born 21 July 1762 by the 1826 census, dead 8 December 1850 at eighty-eight, of house 7, entered «civis» where the men around him are «agla». On this date he would be twenty-one.…
Method
…twice. Before reasoning about who was related to whom, name the book in the holdings that states relationships, and go there first. A one-year gap against the tree is a date against an arithmetic This archive held Jacobus de Franceschi born 21 July 1761 and recorded that the tree said 1762, keeping its own because it «came off the register». The row's own reasoning was right — «one year of arithmetic apart, not one of evidence» — because a record giving «aged N» yields a birth year…
The live tree, read against this archive
…date Cattarina de Franceschi Cattarina Franceschin 1825, 1843, 1826, 1843, Liznjan, Istra burial date Jacobus Defranceschi Jacobus de Franceschi 1762, 1850, 1761, 1850, golo date Valentinus Defranceschi Valentinus Defranceschi 1776, 1839, 1775, 1839, Fiume, Rijeka,…
Worklist
…(p. 20). If a Gračišće or Gologorica source ever names a priest only by «Rev. Joseph De—», it is as likely to be the Deprato as ours. n done this archive 2026-10-06, Where did Jacobus de Franceschi's «21 July 1761» and «3 December 1850» come from? ⚠ Two precise dates sit on Jacobus de Franceschi with no source written down anywhere in this archive — and the death register disagrees with both.…
…to be the Deprato as ours. n done this archive 2026-10-06, Where did Jacobus de Franceschi's «21 July 1761» and «3 December 1850» come from? ⚠ Two precise dates sit on Jacobus de Franceschi with no source written down anywhere in this archive — and the death register disagrees with both. What the register says (Gologorica deaths, M01069273, p. 88): «Decembris 8°· 7· Jacobus…
A dossier is every mention of a name anywhere in this archive's data, gathered automatically and linked back to the page it appears on, with what the archive knows about the person set out at the top. Identity here is by NAME, not by resolved individual: where two people share a name they share a dossier, and the archive says so rather than guessing. Rebuilt from the roster, so every person the archive can name has a page — including the ones read straight off a register that no index anywhere contains.