The Defranceschi Archive
2 indexed marriages · Muina, in the commune of Ovaro, Carnia

Corva

A family that married into this one.

Maria, daughter of the late Giacomo Corva of Muina, married Antonio de Franceschi of Gologorica at Svetvinčenat on 14 March 1785. She was living in the Svetvinčenat parish when she married, though of Muina by origin, and her banns were read at Muina. The archive identifies her, as an inference, with the Maria née Corva who is the mother of Osvaldo de Franceschi of Muina, and who by January 1808 was «vedova del fu Antonio de Franceschi». (doc for the entry; inf for the identification.)

2 person pages in the archive under the surname Corva, or for someone married to a bearer of it. How each is known, in the archive's own words: Read off the register 2. Only the dead are listed here, and the dates are the archive's: none is added.

Corva of Muina

Two people the archive has a page for.

Not yet searched beyond the parish books and the civil registers. The Svetvinčenat marriage book (FamilySearch film 005497886, frame 98) holds the marriage of 1785; on the Italian state archives' portal (Antenati, Archivio di Stato di Udine) the Mione marriage papers and banns of 1808–09 and the Muina papers of 1806–07 have been read.

No step for this family is recorded on the work list. The archive's own statement of the gap is the Carnian route's: «The largest hole in the archive.»

Carnia and Friuli

Ovaro · Mione · Muina · Paluzza · Tolmezzo · Sequals · Lestans · Pinzano
Who held it
Venetian to 1797, Austrian 1815–66, Italian after.
The registers
Archivio di Stato di Udine, and the parish archives; the pre-1806 Ovaro books are in no portal at all.
Beyond the registers
Antenati (the Italian state archives portal) for the civil registration from 1806 — but it 403s this archive and its name search is behind a bot check. The Austrian decades 1815–66 should leave Habsburg administrative traces that nobody has looked for.
Where this archive stands
The largest hole in the archive. Fourteen of the seventy-one in-married families carry Carnian surnames — which is either the strongest circumstantial support the Carnia origin has, or a surname-morphology illusion. It has never been tested against a Carnian register.